Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/318583.pub.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 318583.pub.pdf
Full Text
1,724 charsdepartment in accordance with a call schedule to be prepared by the chair of the
Interventional Cardiology Department. In exchange, he would be paid $700 for each 24
r
II hour day of coverage. He would also have the sole right to bill for his professional
services furnished to patients under the agreement. The contract was to run from April 1,
2007 to March 31, 2008. The March 31, 2008 termination date was the day before Dr.
Sambasivan's existing appointment was due to expire.
When Dr. Sambasivan's clinical privileges came up for renewal in the spring of
2008, he was granted temporary privileges until a recommendation and final decision
could be made about his request for reappointment. Although his written call coverage
agreement expired by its terms at the end of March 2008, the medical staff bylaws and
agreements in the record support an inference for summary judgment purposes that the
hospital's practice was to enter into emergency department call coverage contracts with
5 Kadlec's failure to pay Dr. Sambasivan for call service he provided before the
date of this contract was the basis of his restitution claim. 2012 WL 5208657, at *6-8.
14
No. 31858-3-III
Sambas ivan v. Kadlec Med. Ctr.
every interventional cardiologist on the medical staff. Dr. Sambasivan's 2007 call
contract provides that "[i]fPhysician is a member of the active Medical Staff at the
Medical Center, Physician acknowledges that Physician has an obligation to provide
emergency call coverage in accordance with the Medical Center's Medical Staff Bylaws,
unless granted an exemption or waiver of such obligation." CP at 425. The medical