DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLC, 212 Cal. App. 4th 97 (2012)

Citation
Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLC, 212 Cal. App. 4th 97 (2012)
Parent Document
Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLC, 212 Cal. App. 4th 97 (2012)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2012-11-19
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5811531/oviedo-v-windsor-twelve-properties-llc/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (59)

Full Text

286 chars 
Respondents assert that both the first and second causes of action in appellant’s complaint arise from the protected activity of filing an unlawful detainer action and, thus, the anti-SLAPP statute applies. We disagree in part. a. Appellant’s First Cause of Action: Violation of the RSO