§ 1094
- Citation
- § 1094
- Parent Document
- Cobb v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board, 119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-05-09
Other Sections in This Document (39)
- Cobb v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board, 119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741 (2002)
- Cobb v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board, 119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741 (2002)
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
Full Text
710 charsCobb knew as of mid-May 1998 that Restoni no longer lived in the unit. He acknowledged that he began accepting rent in the full amount directly from Passalacqua alone as of June 1998. He negotiated a rent increase with Passalacqua in October 1998, to take effect November 1, 1998; Restoni was not involved in the negotiation. He complained to Passalacqua in June 1999 that the rent was habitually delinquent and requested delinquent rent payments from him, without reference to any obligation on Restoni’s part for the rent. He sought a rent increase directly from Passalacuqua in September 1999. This evidence reasonably demonstrates that Cole deemed Passalacqua, not Restoni, his sole tenant as of June 1998.