§ 1094
- Citation
- § 1094
- Parent Document
- Cobb v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board, 119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-05-09
Other Sections in This Document (39)
- Cobb v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board, 119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741 (2002)
- Cobb v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board, 119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741 (2002)
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
- § 1094
Full Text
670 charsPrior to enactment of the Costa-Hawkins Act, local rent control ordinances were generally categorized as “strict” or “moderate.” “Strict” or “vacancy control” ordinances continued control of the rent on a unit when it became vacant, prohibiting an increase when a new tenant occupied the unit. “Moderate” or “vacancy decontrol” ordinances, such as the San Francisco Rent Ordinance, permitted a landlord to raise the rent on a unit to market rate when it became vacant and a new tenant moved in; once this new rent was determined the rent was again controlled during this tenant’s occupancy. (Legis. Analyst, analysis of Assem. Bill No. 1164 (1995-1996 Reg. Sess.) p. 2.)