Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)

Citation
Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Parent Document
Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2025-12-18

Other Sections in This Document (114)

Full Text

526 chars
19     Because the notice requirement is preempted because it
contradicts state law, we need not decide whether it is also
preempted because state law fully occupies the field of landlord-
tenant notification timelines such that any local extension of a
statutory notice period is preempted. (See SFAA IV, supra,
104 Cal.App.5th at pp. 1238-1240 [holding ordinance requiring
additional notice and cure period was preempted because “state
statutory law has fully occupied the field of landlord-tenant
notification timelines”].)