Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)

Citation: Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Parent Document: Cal. Apartment Assn. v. City of Pasadena (2025)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2025-12-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10761039/cal-apartment-assn-v-city-of-pasadena/ ↗

Full Text

1,022 chars

6
      In February 2023, petitioners moved for judgment on their
pleading. The City and City Council filed a joint opposition, and
interveners separately opposed the motion as well.
      The court issued a detailed written ruling after hearing
argument. The court denied petitioners’ claims that Measure H
constituted an impermissible revision of the Charter and violated
the state and federal Constitutions with regard to Rental Board
membership. The court ruled in petitioners’ favor on their
preemption claim to the extent section 1806(a)(9) and (10) of
Measure H required greater notice before the termination of a
tenancy than the notice required under Civil Code section 1946.1
and Government Code section 7060.4. The court severed
language from the Measure H provisions and rejected petitioners’
other arguments on the preemption claim.
      The court entered a judgment and issued a peremptory writ
of mandate as to the granted portion of the petition. Petitioners
timely appealed from the judgment. DISCUSSION

Other Sections in This Document (114)

Full Text