Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bisno v. DOUGLAS EMMETT REALTY FUND 1988, 174 Cal. App. 4th 1534 (2009)

Citation
Bisno v. DOUGLAS EMMETT REALTY FUND 1988, 174 Cal. App. 4th 1534 (2009)
Parent Document
Bisno v. DOUGLAS EMMETT REALTY FUND 1988, 174 Cal. App. 4th 1534 (2009)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2009-06-19

Other Sections in This Document (132)

Full Text

401 chars
to the present dispute. Bisno testified at trial that his charter amendment causes of action were based on the CostaHawkins rent increase demand, the three-day notice to quit, and the unlawful detainer action. We analyze each separately and in reverse order. Emmett contends that the reasoning and rationale of Action Apartment apply to the unlawful detainer here. Bisno counters that Action Apartment