§ 1805
- Citation
- § 1805
- Parent Document
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-07-14
Other Sections in This Document (44)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- § 1803
- § 1803
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
Full Text
624 charsThe Board held a hearing on May 28, 2003, during which it received evidence concerning plaintiff’s marital separation and living arrangements and the results of an investigator’s inspections of the apartment’s medicine cabinet, refrigerator, kitchen cabinets and bedroom closets. On August 1, 2003, the Board’s hearing officer authorized an increase in plaintiff’s rent. Douglas, Emmett & Co. raised the rent from $1,111 to $4,295 per month. Plaintiff appealed to the entire Board. Following a postappeal hearing on October 26, 2004, the Board’s hearing officer set the maximum allowable rent at $4,045 per month. DISCUSSION