§ 1805
- Citation
- § 1805
- Parent Document
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-07-14
Other Sections in This Document (44)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 441 (2005)
- § 1803
- § 1803
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
- § 1805
Full Text
349 charsPlaintiff and his wife rented their apartment at The Shores in 1996. Plaintiff’s landlord, Douglas, Emmett & Co., was a primary proponent of Regulation 3304. After its adoption, Douglas, Emmett & Co. petitioned for an increase in the maximum allowable rent on the sole ground that plaintiff’s apartment at The Shores was not his principal residence.