Section 789
- Citation
- Section 789
- Parent Document
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1978-09-28
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1160324/hale-v-morgan/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (116)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
- Section 789
Full Text
892 charsThe record does not disclose how many days plaintiff was actually residing in the premises during the period in question. Plaintiff testified, at one point, that from June 1975 on he resided more or less constantly with his sister because the utility termination made the trailer unlivable. At another point in his testimony he suggested that he continued living in the mobile home until August, when, after defendant had removed its tires, an earthquake knocked it over. Plaintiff’s sister testified that he continued to live in the vehicle, and that she visited him there often. The trial court made no findings as to the frequency, duration and causes of plaintiff’s absences from his mobile home. On any retrial, the court should, in the course of determining a proper penalty under the circumstances of this case, consider the extent to which plaintiff was “deprived” of utility service.