Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/309941.cor.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 309941.cor.pdf
Full Text
1,790 charsCopeland reviewed Officer Dejoumette's overtime and comp time records. He also took
statements from Brownfield, Merryman, Mike Amos, and two YPAL employees, Officer
Rey Garza and civilian Crystal Dodge.
On May 15, Captain Copeland prepared a six-page report, including an appendage
documenting overtime paid to Joe Dejoumette and Jeff Brownfield. The report detailed
his findings in response to Brownfield's allegations. Copeland found no illegal conduct.
He found no evidence of favoritism, but agreed that Officer Dejoumette suffered from
"poor time management skills," which resulted in deficient performance in both the
police department's Fraud Division and the Community Services Division. CP at 156.
Copeland also concluded that Dejoumette failed in his YPAL bookkeeping duties, in part
due to the department's failure to provide training. Copeland recommended an audit of
the yPAL bank account records.
In June, the Yakima Police Department transferred Jeff Brownfield to its patrol
division. In September 2005, a series of incidents led the police department to question
Brownfield's fitness for duty.
The first incident occurred during roll call and entailed a verbal altercation
between Jeff Brownfield and Officer Illeana Salinas over the latter's job performance and
her frequent use of the obscenity "f ... k." In tum, Officer Salinas accused Brownfield
of physical intimidation. The altercation sparked an internal investigation into the
8
No.30994-I-II1
Brownfield v. City a/Yakima
conduct of both officers, which investigation upset Brownfield. The Department chose
not to discipline either officer.
A second incident occurred during the internal investigation of the verbal