Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Citation
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-05-22
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
Full Text
252 chars*1128Wolfriver’s theory is that because plaintiffs’ cause of action against Wolfriver under Civil Code section 1942.4 ended in a dismissal, Wolfriver was the prevailing party as a matter of law and is entitled to its attorney fees in addition to costs.