Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Citation
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-05-22
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
- Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)
Full Text
388 charsThe essential issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in finding Wolfriver was not the prevailing party for purposes of *1126recovery of attorney fees. We conclude plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal of their action against Wolfriver did not confer prevailing party status upon Wolfriver for purposes of recovering attorney fees pursuant to Civil Code section 1942.4.