S.F. Apartment Assn. v. City & County of S.F. (2022)

Citation: S.F. Apartment Assn. v. City & County of S.F. (2022)
Parent Document: S.F. Apartment Assn. v. City & County of S.F. (2022)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2022-01-24
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6244971/sf-apartment-assn-v-city-county-of-sf/ ↗

Full Text

609 chars

8
eviction.” (Id. at p. 491.) The court emphasized that the provision applied “to
landlords acting in good faith as well as unscrupulous landlords” and was
“contingent on the availability of another unit, . . . provid[ing] only an
occasional, weak deterrent.” (Ibid.) The same is not true here. As discussed
above, section 37.10(A)(i) applies only to bad faith, pretextual rent increases
designed to avoid local eviction regulations. It does not regulate permissible
rent increases.
                                  Disposition
      The judgment is affirmed. POLLAK, P. J. WE CONCUR: STREETER, J.
BROWN, J.

Other Sections in This Document (24)

Full Text