DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 1805

Citation
Section 1805
Parent Document
Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 203 Cal. App. 4th 739 (2012)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2012-02-16
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810885/santa-monica-properties-v-santa... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (60)

Full Text

616 chars 
SMP contends the RGB hearing examiner’s compliance decision demonstrates a failure to proceed in the manner required by the RCL. More specifically, SMP argues the hearing examiner violated section 1805(d)(ll) when he reinstated rents effective only as of June 2009. Because we have found SMP’s petition for writ of administrative mandate should have been granted, we find that all decreases in rents ordered by the hearing examiner’s decision should be retroactively paid to SMP. No rent decreases should have been ordered on the evidence presented at the administrative hearing in this case. IV. Traditional Mandate