DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 1805

Citation
Section 1805
Parent Document
Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 203 Cal. App. 4th 739 (2012)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2012-02-16
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810885/santa-monica-properties-v-santa... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (60)

Full Text

483 chars 
On SMP’s petition for writ of administrative mandate, the trial court construed the RCL and Sterling, supra, 168 Cal.App.3d 176 for the proposition that the showing on SMP’s decrease in services, i.e., the timing and temperature changes to the hot tub and sauna, resulted—as a matter of law—in SMP increasing its return. Because we find this interpretation of the RCL to be incorrect, it necessarily follows that the judgment on SMP’s writ of administrative mandate must be reversed.