Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 203 Cal. App. 4th 739 (2012)

Citation: Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 203 Cal. App. 4th 739 (2012)
Parent Document: Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 203 Cal. App. 4th 739 (2012)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2012-02-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810885/santa-monica-properties-v-santa... ↗

Full Text

781 chars

SMP contends the judgment as to its petition for writ of administrative mandate must be reversed because the trial court erred by limiting the scope of judicial review to an examination of whether substantial evidence in the administrative record supported the factual findings set forth in RGB’s final administrative decision. It is SMP’s position that the trial court should have addressed and determined whether RGB failed to “proceed in the manner required by law.” Stated differently, SMP argues the trial court should have *748addressed and determined SMP’s allegation that RGB’s final administrative decision had been reached pursuant to invalid regulations and/or incorrect interpretations of law. On this point, SMP has not persuaded us that the judgment must be reversed.

Other Sections in This Document (60)

Full Text