Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)

Citation: Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Parent Document: Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1989-08-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2172113/kelly-v-choon-yee/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (38)

Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
Section 998
Section 998
Section 998
Section 998
Section 998
Section 998
Section 998
Section 998
Section 998
Section 998
section 37
section 37
section 37

Full Text

357 chars

There is scant merit in respondents’ additional argument that the award of treble damages violates due process. While the courts have invalidated statutory penalties which are “wholly disproportionate to any discernible and legitimate legislative goal,” we know of no authority holding that treble damages are constitutionally defective. (Cf. Hale v. Morgan