Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Citation
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-08-22
Other Sections in This Document (38)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- section 37
- section 37
- section 37
Full Text
770 charsOn October 22, 1987, respondents made a written offer of settlement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 to have judgment entered against them in the sum of $25,000, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. Appellants refused the offer, and the case went to trial the following month. In special verdicts, the jury found that appellants had been wrongfully evicted in violation of the rent control ordinance, awarding Mary Kelly general damages of $1,788 and punitive damages of $500 and awarding Huang Yang Shih Chien general damages of $3,164 and punitive damages of $500. The jury found for respondents, however, on the causes of action for breach of the implied warranty of habitability. Judgment on the verdict was entered December 14, 1987.