Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Citation
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-08-22
Other Sections in This Document (38)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Kelly v. Choon Yee, 213 Cal. App. 3d 336 (1989)
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- Section 998
- section 37
- section 37
- section 37
Full Text
692 charsThis appeal concerns a suit filed in San Francisco Superior Court on September 8, 1986, by three evicted tenants, Mary Kelly, Huang Yang Shih Chien, and Carol Huang, against their landlords, Choon Yee and Eva Yee (hereafter respondents). The original and first amended complaints alleged eight causes of action, but the case went to trial only on theories of breach of the implied warranty of habitability and wrongful eviction under section 37.9 of the San Francisco Administrative Code. Mary Kelly and Huang Yang Shih Chien (hereafter appellants) pursued both theories; Carol Huang abandoned the claim of wrongful eviction and sought recovery solely on the implied warranty of habitability.