DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Kaushansky v. Stonecroft Attorneys, APC (2025)

Citation
Kaushansky v. Stonecroft Attorneys, APC (2025)
Parent Document
Kaushansky v. Stonecroft Attorneys, APC (2025)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2025-03-14
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10356658/kaushansky-v-stonecroft-attorneys-apc/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Full Text

383 chars 
25
44 Cal.App.4th 1689; Merenda v. Superior Court (1992)
3 Cal.App.4th 1, disapproved on a different ground by Ferguson v.
Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1037,
1053.) Stonecroft acknowledges “a breach of fiduciary duty is a
species of tort distinct from a cause of action for professional
negligence.” (Stanley, supra, 35 Cal.App.4th at p. 1086.) DISPOSITION