Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 25064 (2025)

Citation
Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 25064 (2025)
Parent Document
Tibta v. 156 E 21 LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 25064 (2025)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2025-03-18

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text

746 chars
In reply, respondents again request that the court consider what respondents frame as an equitable solution to a monetary undertaking. In support of this proposition, respondents cite to this court's decision in Newmont Properties v Callendar, 225 NYS3d 893 (Civ Ct, Kings County 2025), and urge an undertaking be set upon equitable grounds. Respondents also, for the first time, suggest that an undertaking be set at an amount somewhere between $515, the monthly rent for apartment 1C set forth in one of two leases admitted into evidence at trial, and $1,600, the monthly rent preserved in the second lease which was admitted into evidence for apartment 1C. (NYSCEF Doc No. 57, respondents' attorney's reply affirmation ¶¶ 9-11.) [*4]DISCUSSION