Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hudsonview Co. v. Jenkins, 169 Misc. 2d 389 (1996)

Citation
Hudsonview Co. v. Jenkins, 169 Misc. 2d 389 (1996)
Parent Document
Hudsonview Co. v. Jenkins, 169 Misc. 2d 389 (1996)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
1996-06-04

Other Sections in This Document (36)

Full Text

575 chars
. Even in a RPAPL 711 (5) or 715 (1) proceeding, where a notice of termination would not otherwise be required, such a notice has been held to *395be a necessary predicate if the premises are covered, Federally subsidized accommodations. (Jackson Terrace Assocs. v Paterson, 155 Misc 2d 556, appeal dismissed 159 Misc 2d 637.) Service of such a termination notice in compliance with Federal law is required by supremacy doctrine. (US Const, art VI, cl [2] [Supremacy Clause].) Noncompliance with Federal regulations has not been raised by respondent here and is not at issue.