Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Citation
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Parent Document
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1980-05-09
Other Sections in This Document (19)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
Full Text
466 charsThe rent stabilization law provides, by virtue of the penalties against the landlord, ample protection for the tenant. The consequences of an intentional refusal by a landlord to renew a lease can be and often are quite extensive and *83serious and might include return of the apartment in question to rent control status. These penalties and the enforcement thereof are within the jurisdiction of the Conciliation and Appeals Board (hereinafter referred to as CAB).