Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Citation
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Parent Document
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1980-05-09
Other Sections in This Document (19)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
- Pierre v. Williams, 106 Misc. 2d 81 (1980)
Full Text
460 charsPetitioner opposes the motion on the ground that respondent has remained in possession of the apartment after expiration of a written lease and is now a month-to-month tenant by operation of the law (Real Property Law, § 232-c), and that all of the terms and conditions of the lease are projected into the tenancy created by said statute. Said lease contained a jury waiver clause and therefore, petitioner contends, respondent may not now demand a jury trial.