Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)

Citation: Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Parent Document: Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 1980-12-08
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6332606/century-apartments-inc-v-yalkowsky/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)

Full Text

548 chars

Special note was made that the trial on the warranty issue necessarily establishes whether the claim for inten*768tional infliction of mental distress will fall because the conduct does not reach the requisite level of atrocious conduct. The court does not here rule upon the question of whether that claim might also be dismissed because the conduct falls within some other cognizable claim. (See Fischer v Maloney, 43 NY2d 553, 557-558, supra, and the extensive discussion of New York law in Alexander v Unification Church of Amer., 634 F2d 673.)