Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Citation
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Parent Document
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1980-12-08
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
- Century Apartments, Inc. v. Yalkowsky, 106 Misc. 2d 762 (1980)
Full Text
648 charsA further counterclaim has been interposed which is the *767substantial equivalent of a claim for the intentional infliction of mental distress, although not clearly denominated. Under the standards of New York law, conduct underlying that claim must be “ ‘extreme and outrageous’ * * * ‘go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and * * * be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community’ ”. (Fischer v Maloney, 43 NY2d 553, 557, adopting the language of Restatement, Torts 2d, § 46, Comment d.) The conduct here, while reprehensible, does not reach that base standard. EFFECT OF LEASE PROVISION PROHIBITING COUNTERCLAIMS