Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Citation
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Parent Document
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1984-04-10
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
- Kachian v. Aronson, 123 Misc. 2d 743 (1984)
Full Text
849 charsAs a result of disputes with respect to the condition of the building the tenants ceased paying rent as of April, 1980 (coincidentally the date from which rent may retroactively be collected under section 285 of the Multiple Dwelling Law). Unpaid rent claimed by petitioner for the second floor unit totals $17,178, computed as follows: $350 per month for 39 months (April, 1980 to June, 1983) and $441 per month for 8 months (July, 1983 to February, 1984). For the fourth floor petitioner claims $15,460.20, computed as follows: $315 per month for the same 39 months and $396.90 for each of the latter 8 months. The increase of 26% claimed as of July, 1983 is based on order No. 1 issued by the Loft Board (the Board). Respondents contend that the increase should be only 22%. Otherwise, the mathematical calculation of unpaid rent is not disputed.