Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Citation
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Parent Document
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-03-08
Other Sections in This Document (9)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Section 235-b
- Section 235-b
- Section 235-b
Full Text
401 charsThe courts generally rule that the lease rental agreement is competent evidence of the apartment’s value as warranted, and, in the absence of other evidence, the lease is controlling in determining the damages for breach of the warranty of habitability. (See, 111 E. 88th Partners v Simon, 106 Misc 2d 693 [1980], affd as mod on other grounds 127 Misc 2d 74.) 3. Section 235-b of the Real Property Law