Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Citation
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Parent Document
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-03-08
Other Sections in This Document (9)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Committed Community Associates v. Croswell, 164 Misc. 2d 756 (1995)
- Section 235-b
- Section 235-b
- Section 235-b
Full Text
648 charsWhile the respondent’s rent is paid partly by the tenant and partially by the Federal Government, the record clearly establishes that the market value of the premises in question is the contract rent. (See, Greenwich Gardens Assocs. v Pitt, 126 Misc 2d 947 [Nassau Dist Ct 1984] [where the court found that section 8 payments made on behalf of the tenant must be considered as rent payments]; see also, Swann v Gastonia Horn. Auth., 502 F Supp 362, affd in part, revd in part on other grounds 675 F2d 1342 [where the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that section 8 payments are rent].) III. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS 1. Standard measure of damages