Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Citation
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Parent Document
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-12-03
Other Sections in This Document (25)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
- Grady v. Hessert Realty L.P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8598 (2019)
Full Text
705 charsDefendants denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses including that they had refunded to plaintiff, any overcharge. Defendants also moved for summary judgment. Defendants argued that the four-year lookback period applied unless plaintiff could prove fraud, which she could not. Defendants claimed they had treated plaintiff as a deregulated tenant based on the representations of prior management, and when they realized their error they offered to reimburse her, and began treating her as a rent-stabilized tenant. Defendants asserted that a rent freeze based solely on the failure to register was unjustified, and that the cases holding otherwise involved clear examples of fraud.