Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Matter of Regina Metro. Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 2018 NY Slip Op 5797 (2018)

Citation
Matter of Regina Metro. Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 2018 NY Slip Op 5797 (2018)
Parent Document
Matter of Regina Metro. Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 2018 NY Slip Op 5797 (2018)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2018-08-16

Other Sections in This Document (82)

Full Text

689 chars
We do not disturb DHCR's fact-finding. DHCR's determination that landlord did not fraudulently deregulate the unit has a rational basis. An increase in rent, standing alone, does not establish a fraudulent scheme to evade rent stabilization (see Conason v Megan Holding, LLC, 25 NY3d 1, 16 [2015]). Tenants point to suspicions about landlord's claimed IAIs and its failure to provide a rent-stabilized lease at some unspecified time after Roberts. These vague assertions provide no basis for disturbing DHCR's finding that there was no evidence of fraud by landlord. As discussed at greater length below, the absence of fraud affects our analysis of how DHCR calculated the base date rent.