Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Matter of Regina Metro. Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 2018 NY Slip Op 5797 (2018)

Citation
Matter of Regina Metro. Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 2018 NY Slip Op 5797 (2018)
Parent Document
Matter of Regina Metro. Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 2018 NY Slip Op 5797 (2018)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2018-08-16

Other Sections in This Document (82)

Full Text

682 chars
Tenants argued before DHCR that there was evidence that landlord had engaged in a fraudulent scheme to evade rent regulation of the unit and that the correct rent should be set via the default formula specified in Thornton v Baron (5 NY3d 175 [2005]) or the similar default formulas under Rent Stabilization Code (RSC) (9 NYCRR)§ 2522.6(b)(2) and (3). Additionally, even if a default formula would not be appropriate, tenants asserted that the rent should be frozen at $2,096.47 because, as in Jazilek v Abart Holdings, LLC (72 AD3d 529 [1st Dept 2010]), landlord failed to file proper and timely rent registration statements. Tenants also sought treble damages and attorneys' fees.