Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Taylor, 115 A.D.3d 50 (2014)

Citation
Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Taylor, 115 A.D.3d 50 (2014)
Parent Document
Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Taylor, 115 A.D.3d 50 (2014)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2014-01-21

Other Sections in This Document (61)

Full Text

526 chars
The majority relies on Bunny Realty v Miller (180 AD2d 460 [1st Dept 1992]), in which this Court found that Real Property Law § 234 was applicable, reasoning that a similar reletting expenses provision was “sufficiently broad to allow the landlord to procure counsel fees for any reason, including breach of lease, so long as the ultimate result would be to take possession or re-rent the apartment” (id. at 462-463; see Matter of Casamento v Juaregui, 88 AD3d 345, 356 [2nd Dept 2011] [quoting this portion of Bunny Realty]).