Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Chan v. Adossa, 195 Misc. 2d 590 (2003)

Citation
Chan v. Adossa, 195 Misc. 2d 590 (2003)
Parent Document
Chan v. Adossa, 195 Misc. 2d 590 (2003)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2003-02-25

Full Text

429 chars
Furthermore, a contrary result would mean that an MDR statement is a jurisdictional prerequisite even in a proceeding required to be brought because the property is being used for an illegal trade or business (RPAPL 711 [5]). It is doubtful that the Administrative Code would have intended to preclude the maintenance of such a proceeding solely because the premises was unregistered, as this would not be in the public interest.