Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Chan v. Adossa, 195 Misc. 2d 590 (2003)

Citation
Chan v. Adossa, 195 Misc. 2d 590 (2003)
Parent Document
Chan v. Adossa, 195 Misc. 2d 590 (2003)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2003-02-25

Full Text

495 chars
The legislative intention underlying the Administrative Code provision was to foster compliance with the registration requirement by precluding, during the period of noncompliance, the recovery of rents and the recovery of possession based on nonpayment of rent. The requirement in the Administrative Code and in the court rule that the petition include the MDR allegation was designed to implement this rent sanction and not to impose a jurisdictional prerequisite to all RPAPL 711 proceedings.