DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Independent 435 CPW Tenants' Assn. v. Park Front Apts., LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01716 (2025)

Citation
Independent 435 CPW Tenants' Assn. v. Park Front Apts., LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01716 (2025)
Parent Document
Independent 435 CPW Tenants' Assn. v. Park Front Apts., LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 01716 (2025)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2025-03-20
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10360824/independent-435-cpw-tenants-as... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (32)

Full Text

446 chars 
Considering the above, the parties' arguments as to whether defendant's "documentary evidence" affirmative defense adequately asserted luxury deregulation (see CPLR 3018 [b]; Bradbury v 342 W. 30th St. Corp., 84 AD3d 681, 683 [1st Dept 2011]; see also e.g. Scholastic Inc. v Pace Plumbing Corp., 129 AD3d 75, 79-80 [1st Dept 2015]; Ryan v Kellogg Partners Inst. Servs., 79 AD3d 447, 448 [1st Dept 2010], affd 19 NY3d 1 [2012]) are therefore moot.