Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Chini v. Chini, 189 A.D.3d 986 (2020)

Citation
Chini v. Chini, 189 A.D.3d 986 (2020)
Parent Document
Chini v. Chini, 189 A.D.3d 986 (2020)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2020-12-09

Full Text

744 chars
In September 2017, the plaintiff commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a judgment declaring that he is a rent stabilized tenant and that the defendants and all successors are required to comply with the provisions of the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 and the Rent Stabilization Code with respect to the plaintiff's tenancy. After issue was joined, but prior to the completion of discovery, Albert and Mary moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and on a counterclaim they had interposed for a judgment declaring that the apartment and the plaintiff's occupancy of it are not subject to rent stabilization. Following oral argument, the Supreme Court granted that motion. The plaintiff appeals.