In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain premises and the plaintiff's tenancy were protected under the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 and the Rent Stabilization Code, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Debra Silber, J.), dated May 31, 2018, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated July 2, 2018. The order granted the motion of the defendants Albert Chini and Mary Collins, as executors of the estate of Anelia Chini, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and on their counterclaim for a judgment declaring that the subject premises and the plaintiff's tenancy were not protected under the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 and the Rent Stabilization Code. The judgment, upon the order, is, in effect, in favor of those defendants and against the plaintiff dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and on their counterclaim, and declaring that the subject premises and the plaintiff's tenancy were not protected under the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 and the Rent Stabilization Code.