Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Citation
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-05-30
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
- Shree Shiv Shakti Corp. v. Khalid Properties, LLC, 106 A.D.3d 1434 (2013)
Full Text
744 charsPlaintiff thereafter commenced this action against Khalid and VSH, alleging constructive eviction, trespass and breach of contract, and seeking treble damages pursuant to RPAPL 853 and the return of the security deposit. Following joinder of issue, Khalid commenced a third-party action against Patel, alleging that, by virtue of the “Guaranty,” he was jointly and severally liable for the rent that plaintiff owed under the lease. Khalid and VSH jointly moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and Khalid also sought summary judgment on its counterclaims that it had asserted against plaintiff and on the third-party complaint. Finding multiple issues of fact, Supreme Court denied the motion in its entirety. Only Khalid appeals.