Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

PK Restaurant, LLC v. Lifshutz, 138 A.D.3d 434 (2016)

Citation
PK Restaurant, LLC v. Lifshutz, 138 A.D.3d 434 (2016)
Parent Document
PK Restaurant, LLC v. Lifshutz, 138 A.D.3d 434 (2016)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2016-04-05

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text

285 chars
that a notice of pendency filed by a possessory leaseholder could be viable, plaintiff had grounds to believe that it was justified in filing a notice of pendency. Therefore, it should not be forced to pay “costs and expenses occasioned by the filing and cancellation” (CPLR 6514 [c]).