DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

PK Restaurant, LLC v. Lifshutz, 138 A.D.3d 434 (2016)

Citation
PK Restaurant, LLC v. Lifshutz, 138 A.D.3d 434 (2016)
Parent Document
PK Restaurant, LLC v. Lifshutz, 138 A.D.3d 434 (2016)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2016-04-05
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3191564/pk-restaurant-llc-v-lifshutz/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text

392 chars 
The Realty defendants contend that the sixth cause of action (specific performance against Realty) should be dismissed because, inter alia, plaintiff can be adequately compensated with money damages. However, resolution of the question whether money damages would adequately compensate plaintiff must await a fuller record (see Sokoloff v Harriman Estates Dev. Corp., 96 NY2d 409, 415 [2001];