Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Citation
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Parent Document
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-10-28
Other Sections in This Document (44)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
- Kent v. 534 East 11th Street, 80 A.D.3d 106 (2010)
Full Text
855 charsThe plaintiffs complaint does not include a cause of action for breach of implied contract provisions. Nevertheless, since an implied warranty of habitability exists in every residential lease (see Granirer v Bakery, Inc., 54 AD3d 269 [1st Dept 2008]), the plaintiff rests on this cause of action at the last minute. This does not help the plaintiff. The implied warranty of habitability sets forth a minimum standard to protect ten*113ants against conditions that render residential premises uninhabitable or unuseable. (Real Property Law § 235-b; see also Solow v Wellner, 86 NY2d 582 [1995].) Tenants alleging breach of the warranty of habitability must provide evidence sufficient to support their claims. (See Park W. Mgt. Corp. v Mitchell, 47 NY2d 316, 328 [1979], cert denied 444 US 992 [1979]; Minjak Co. v Randolph, 140 AD2d 245 [1st Dept 1988].)