Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Citation
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Parent Document
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2017-12-29
Other Sections in This Document (20)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
Full Text
467 charsI disagree with the majority's finding of a breach of the implied warranty of habitability. In my opinion, plaintiff never asserted a claim for breach of the implied warranty of habitability [*3]either in his complaint or at oral argument, but rather confined his challenge to the quality of the repairs.[FN1] Even if such a breach were alleged, I would find that plaintiff failed to show how his health or well being had been affected by the allegedly poor repairs.