Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Citation
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Parent Document
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2017-12-29
Other Sections in This Document (20)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
- Grinberg v. Eissenberg (2017)
Full Text
374 charsOn appeal, plaintiff argues that the court erred in dismissing the complaint because he had established his right to recover as a matter of law based on defendants' breach of Multiple Dwelling Law § 78, the proprietary lease, the warranty of habitability, and an oral contract between himself and defendant Eissenberg, personally and as a representative of 1802 and Newport.