Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)

Citation
campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
Parent Document
campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2025-11-14

Full Text

858 chars
The evidence in this case shows that Limoge sent by certified and first-class mail to
Campbell’s Apartment address her June 25, 2025 acceptance of Campbell’s June 19, 2025 offer
to extend his tenancy through August 31, 2025. Until that time, Campbell had identified the
Apartment address as his only address and Limoge consistently communicated successfully with
Campbell through mail sent to that address. (Ex’s. 1-3.) Campbell also testified that he tracked
Limoge’s June 25, 2025 letter on the U.S. Postal Service website using its tracking number and
observed that the letter remained undelivered. This testimony does not suffice to rebut 9 V.S.A.
§4451’s rebuttable presumption when taken alongside the other evidence establishing
consistently successful communication between Campbell and Limoge through mailings sent to
and from the Apartment address.