campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- Citation
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- Parent Document
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-11-14
- Original Source
- https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/media/19595 ↗
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
- campbell v limoge, No. 25-sc-2051 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025)
Full Text
744 charsPresumably unaware of Limoge's acceptance of his request to extend his Apartment tenancy through August 31, 2025, Campbell left the Apartment on June 30, 2025. He sent Limoge a June 30, 2025 letter which she received around July 7, 2025 that "serve[d] as [his] formal confirmation that [he] ha[d] vacated" the Apartment. (See Ex. 6.) Limoge sent Campbell a July 11, 2025 "Security Deposit Transmittal" outlining her retention of his $2,600 security deposit as credit toward unpaid rent in the same amount for July 2025 and itemizing an additional $92.90 allegedly owed to her for an unpaid water bill for April 15 to July 11, 2025. (See Ex. 8.) Campbell brought this action because he believes Limoge owes him his security deposit. Discussion