215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- Citation
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- Parent Document
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2026-01-07
- Original Source
- https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/media/19746 ↗
Other Sections in This Document (15)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
- 215 summer street v thibodeau, No. 23-cv-5356 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
Full Text
684 charsAdditionally, the Plaintiff was able to amend her complaint pursuant to V.R.C.P. 15(a) but failed to do so. The Plaintiff could have added the no cause eviction count after the date of termination on December 31, 2023, which is permitted under 9 V.S.A. § 4467(i). Again, the Plaintiff’s election not to amend the complaint to add the no cause eviction when it became ripe is not a basis to seek relief from judgment now under V.R.C.P. 60(b)(1). See e.g., Penland v. Warren, 2018 VT 70, ¶ 7, 208 Vt. 15 (“[R]ule [60] does not protect a party from tactical decisions which in retrospect may seem ill advised, and it is not an open invitation to reconsider matters concluded at trial.”).