Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Narcisa Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc., 498 F.2d 937 (1974)

Citation
Narcisa Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc., 498 F.2d 937 (1974)
Parent Document
Narcisa Lopez v. Henry Phipps Plaza South, Inc., 498 F.2d 937 (1974)
Effective Date
1974-06-18

Other Sections in This Document (71)

Full Text

586 chars
If upon the coming down of the order litigants might demand rehearings as a matter of law because some new circumstance has arisen, some new trend has been observed, or some new fact discovered, there would be little hope that the administrative process could ever be consummated in an order that would not be subject to reopening. It has been almost a rule of necessity that rehearings were not matters of right, but were pleas to discretion. And likewise it has been considered that the discretion to be invoked was that of the body making the order, and not that of a reviewing body.