Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (2018)

Citation: Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (2018)
Parent Document: Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (2018)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2018-05-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4502306/heriberto-rodriguez-v-county-of... ↗

Full Text

681 chars

Fourth, appellants argue that the district court should have
allowed live testimony from some of the appellees as well as
some non-party inmates. Appellee Rodriguez did provide
live testimony. The other appellees and the non-party
inmates testified by means of video depositions. The district
court had authorized the taking of these depositions on the
understanding that they could be used at trial in lieu of live
testimony, and appellants were able to cross examine the
witnesses during the depositions. Before trial, appellees
successfully moved for admission of the videotaped
depositions, listing a driving mileage of 126 miles between
58                   RODRIGUEZ V. CRUZ

Other Sections in This Document (185)

Full Text